Total reward is dead, according to Duncan Brown, head of the UK performance, reward and talent consulting practice at Aon, and Martha How, partner, reward and benefits at Aon.
Speaking in a session on ‘The demise of total reward’ at Employee Benefits Live on 24 September, Brown explained that the impact of the recession and the slow pace at which pay increases appear to be returning have changed reward and benefits irrecoverably. “The scale of what has happened over the last five or six years is still being assessed,” he said.
“Something does appear to have changed. The question is what is that something?”
One option is to move to a model of shared responsibility. How explained that, historically, employers have implemented flexible benefits schemes ostensibly for staff engagement and motivation purposes, when in reality, the move was primarily cost driven.
Going forward, she explained that employers have two choices. Firstly, they could continue with a market-driven approach that is bureauocratic, driven by costs and will mean that they still experience issues with differentiation, as well as mean that some demographics, such as graduates, cannot afford to pay into a pension scheme.
Alternatively, they could adopt a shared responsibility model, whereby the employee takes control of their full financial situation with their enabler acting as a facilitator and enabler, for example, by providing the workforce with the financial education they need to be able to take control.
How explained that a shared responsibility model would comprise five or six core benefits coupled with a self-serve ethos for employees. “If the employer provides the tools, provides the flexibility and provides the career development, the employee will have to walk down the road,” said How.
But communication is vital to ensure the success of this approach. “It is less about design and desire and more about communication and engagement. “Reward professionals will become marketeers,” said How.
Also, driving the demise of total reward is the ongoing squeeze between wages and pay inflation means some employees have seen up to a 12% drop in real income since before the recession, said Brown.
This is typically being felt more keenly by workers at the lower end of the pay scale, female employees and younger staff. As a result, there is now a real divide among workforces between ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’.
Consequently, salary levels have become more important as a recruitment and retention tool, with many employers no longer using benefits to differentiate themselves from competitors.
Sign up to our newsletters
Receive news and guidance on a range of HR issues direct to your inbox
“[Shared responsibility] is an effective direction for reward and a long-term sustainable model,” said How.
It is very surprising to hear this type of comment from Duncan Brown. Total Reward – when strategically implemented and introduced – is intrinsically about ‘shared responsibility’ and not just cost savings. Total Reward is not flexible benefits – it is far more than that, and includes opportunities for employees to have an input into their reward and career development. Whilst base pay levels will always be important, a correctly designed, communicated and shared total reward system will go a long way towards proving more personal and valuable reward for people.
Rosalind- thanks for this we were rather hoping for a reaction like this.. to get the conversation “out there”. The EB article doesnt quite reflect what we were saying- To be fair to them it would be very hard to do in a short piece. Duncan has written a 3000+ page paper on it! Please dont be put off by the headline. I agree “total reward” should be about shared responsibility but when implemented in practice, so many many times we have seen it fail to get this message across. And yes of course total reward does not equal flex- I certainly did not say that. If you would like to hear the full script let us know as we will be doing a full webinar on the subject. I agree with your last line but believe employers must be cognisant of the importance of cash sufficiency.
I was going to write a similar riposte; TRS as a concept sold by EBC’s who’s primary motivation was selling their benefits consulting services, often skipped the worthy total reward principles applied and leveraged by companies who implemented total reward strategies successfully. And continue to use them today. Total reward as an engagement principle is alive and well; a keystone of EVP. While the challenges in communicating and engaging over reward persist, I think it is fair to say it is evolving rather than expired.
Well said Tristram.
I went to the session hoping to hear something game changing but expecting to be disappointed. I was not let down. Prior to advising some overpaid execs on their latest rewards Duncan breathlessly outlined his latest thinking. Oh my god all those fees earned advising on the latest tax opportunity were apparently wrong and he now wants to be the architect of change to put cash in our hands and at the same time close the gap between the haves and the have nots!
Maybe I was upset by a little dig at the retail sector apparently leading a race to the bottom of the pay market through zero hours contracts. But Smart Reward, New Paternalism whatever you call it, I believe there is a lot more life in the Total Reward approach done really well and as reward professionals we should be working even harder to make that work for our employees and our businesses rather than be distracted (just yet) by Duncan and Martha’s latest thinking.
I apologise for any disappointment but I have to agree total reward when well implemented has worked… it’s just that we have seen far too many examples of poor implementation, blind following the market and short termism and cost control driving. Not to ignore commercial pressure…. which drives so much of what we do every day. So yes… maybe evolution rather than revolution is fair. Thanks for your comments… it would have been nice to have engaged during the session.
Goodness Richard, I dont think my tax knoiwledge, or lack of it, would ever earn much money for Aon! Seriously, i agree employers such as Tesco and Costco have shown there is an alternative model to posit in opposition to the race to the bottom in wage costs. But i stand by my main point, that the unthinking, copycat, flex-focused approach to total rewards that predominates has not done it any favours and unless the concept is updated and revived in practice, then i see no future for it having any sort of credibility with employees or in the boardroom..
thanks duncan